@noeman55 You can build your own on our subdomain. If we like what you have to say we'll push it up on the main site. https://debacled.walterfootball.com/ReaderPowerRankings
One could say that the Commanders offense, and Daniels injuries, are the result of the poor play of Tunsil. The Texans were correct in moving him when they did.
The Steelers dominated the Browns today, so it’s safe to predict that Pittsburgh will win the north. Baltimore is a complete mess right now, the Bengals can’t win without Joe Burrow and Cleveland’s offense is a disaster. Maybe the Steelers aren’t that bad afterall.
Assuming the Ravens get Lamar Jackson and a handful of other key players back from injury following their bye, they're set up for a run that might put them on PIT's tail. BAL might come out of their post-bye CHI, MIA, MIN, CLE, NYJ, CIN, PIT, CIN schedule run 7-7 and in contention.
I have no idea why I ever look at your site even. You have the Bucs at 10? Pathetic. You are a homer and you don't know anything about football. You have the f'ing Falcons higher. The bucs are nearly 2nd string Offense and yet, still winning. Get lost dude. If they get fully healthy, forget 'bout it.
Typical horrible take on the Bucs and Baker Mayfield. He is the MVP leader right now, hands down. Bucs also are better then the Chargers and Rams easily. If the Bucs were 5-0, you would have them at 9 probably. You hate the Bucs...always have and your bias shows all the time.
The Texans are still an awful team, regardless of what happened against Baltimore. People are suddenly pretending that Baltimore hasn’t been slated wirh injuries all over just to try and make it sound as if Houston is back. I’m wagering that Seattle and San Francisco will blow out the Texans.
Walter! What is the deal with all of the Lions sarcasm? I still think, after the Baltimore win, this season will be a struggle and that there is still a good chance they miss the playoffs.
But are you realiy hearing from the national media and from dopes on Twitter that the Lions are unstoppable and the best team in the league? I heard a LOT more people say this team was done and that Campbell was a goon who couldn’t get it done without his elite coordinators after the GB loss.
Walter, the crusty confederate homosexual, is too stupid or still stuck in the 19th century to realize that Washington's team name is "Commanders". Dumb DEI hire.
K, so Denver is looking like a Group C team, and Indy outplayed them to the tune of 149 yards more offense (or 1.1 more yards per paly). Good observations. Now, explain again why you ranked the victorious Colts 4 ositions lower than the Broncos. Show some backbone!
Totally disagree with Ravens being #1. NFl Football is a 60 minute game. Winners don't dominate for 55 minutes only to be able to slack off the last 5 if this game really was played multiple times and the Tavens still snoozed at the end. They would still lose. No bonus points if cant play the whole 60
The Vikings are hard to read. Still, I think this list overvalues them.
O'Connell has a knack for extracting lemonade from lemons at QB, but those were veterans. McCarthy is green and didn't throw too many passes at Michigan. We'll see.
The MIN interior O-line improvements look good on paper, but the Vikes are relying on a rookie and two injury-plagued guys the Colts and other suitors had no interest in overpaying. The situation doesn't feel as dependable as the Thuney/Dalman upgrades to the CHI interior O-line.
I worry about the MIN run defense. After trading Harrison Phillips, there's no real NT to keep blockers off of Cashman and Pace.
The MIN secondary is worrisome. Jeff Okudah is a starter. Not good. And Harrison Smith could become a liability at any second.
It's nice that someone actually states the blatant obvious and that the Chiefs are so looked after by the officials. 14 points in one game, and 10 in the other, it makes the League look more farcical.
When it comes to minnesota you're either lying to squeeze a square into your circle narrative by saying minnesota didn't have convincing wins over the Titans (they beat them by 10) and the Bears (beat them by 18) and the Falcons (beat them by 21) or you're penalizing them for not blowing out every team they play. Either way you're showing your obvious hating. I still can't get over you thinking Green Bay had nothing to play for so they didn't even try. Hahaha too funny. That loss means now they might have to go to Philly in the wildcard. A win against Minnesota would have meant they had a good chance at going to Tampa Bay. You don't think they cared at all about that? Start watching golf or something because you clearly don't understand football.
@biskit52250 im a fan of this site but i must say, Walt has had a weird obsession with the Packers all year long. They’re unimpressive. They’ve been in several dog fights with bad teams and have no real quality wins. As a Lions fan, it has been apparent to me that you guys are the superior team. Even after Sunday night I still respect you guys more than the Lackers. It seems inconsistent to me that Walt knocks some teams for ugly wins and bad records vs good teams while excusing other teams for doing exactly that.
Your Packers bias is crazy. If you swapped them with the Vikings the Packers would be 0-5 against A tier teams.
Also acting like the Packers lost just because they weren't trying is a coping answer. You bet money on them and said there was no motivational edge. Putting the packers above the team that swept them is insanity.
Solid power rankings! Its so obvious now that Packers didn’t care about some meaningless week 17 divisional matchup. Its not like winning couldve helped their standings in the wild card.
Thank god it was clearly warned in the picks yesterday thay GB wouldnt try. Not like someone bet 5 units on them and even predicted theyd win outright.
)
